Larimar Pay

Market Town

Localising for North America: Lessons for Scottish Fintechs

By Atlantic Fintech

Expanding into North America is a natural next step for many ambitious Scottish fintechs. The market is large, sophisticated, and innovation-friendly – but it is not a single, unified landscape. Success depends less on scaling what already works at home, and more on adapting thoughtfully across product, language, and market expectations.

At Atlantic Fintech, we’ve worked closely with fintechs on both sides of the Atlantic. A consistent theme emerges: localisation is not a final step – it’s strategy from day one.

North America Is Not One Market

One of the most common misconceptions is treating North America as a single, homogeneous opportunity. In reality, it is a patchwork of regulatory environments, consumer behaviors, and financial systems.

  • Canada and the U.S. operate under different regulatory frameworks, with further variation at the provincial and state levels.
  • Payments infrastructure differs significantly (for example, Interac in Canada versus ACH and card-heavy systems in the U.S.).
  • Procurement cycles, especially in financial institutions, tend to be longer and more relationship-driven than in the UK.

For Scottish fintechs, this means market entry should start with a clear geographic focus rather than a continent-wide approach.

Product Localisation: Beyond Compliance

Adapting your product for North America goes well beyond regulatory compliance. It requires aligning with local user expectations and financial habits.

  • Integrate with region-specific payment rails and financial data systems.
  • Reflect local financial terminology and user flows (e.g., “checking account” vs. “current account”).
  • Ensure your product aligns with local security expectations and trust signals, which can vary by market.

An example: a fintech offering open banking-enabled services in the UK may need to rethink its data access strategy in North America, where open banking frameworks are still evolving and often rely on different providers and standards.

Language and Communication Nuances

Even in English-speaking markets, language localisation matters more than many expect. Subtle differences in tone, terminology, and messaging can affect credibility and conversion.

  • North American audiences tend to prefer more direct, benefits-driven messaging.
  • Marketing content often leans less on understatement and more on clarity and value proposition.
  • Bilingual requirements – particularly in Canada – add another layer. French is not optional in Québec and can strengthen brand trust nationally.

For Scottish fintechs, this is less about translation and more about transcreation: ensuring your message resonates culturally, not just linguistically.

Finding Product-Market Fit

Product-market fit in North America often requires iteration, even for well-established companies.

  • Customer expectations around onboarding, UX, and support can differ significantly.
  • Enterprise buyers may expect local presence, partnerships, or pilots before committing.
  • Pricing models may need adjustment to align with local purchasing norms and budgets.

Partnerships can be a powerful accelerator. Collaborating with local fintech ecosystems, financial institutions, or innovation hubs can provide faster access to networks and insights.

A Note on Atlantic Canada

While Toronto and New York often dominate conversations about North American fintech, Atlantic Canada offers a compelling – and often overlooked – entry point. Atlantic Canada can serve as an effective “soft landing” zone for international fintechs. It allows companies to test, adapt, and refine their North American strategy in a more agile and supportive setting before scaling into larger markets.

The region also shares many similarities with Scotland: a growing fintech sector made up of over 150 ambitious fintechs, strong ecosystem support from government and industry, and a collaborative, community-driven approach to innovation. Scottish companies looking for a familiar yet globally connected environment can benefit from:

  • Close-knit fintech and startup ecosystems that enable faster relationship-building.
  • Lower operational costs compared to major financial centres.
  • Direct access to both North American and European markets through strong trade ties and cultural alignment.

Building for Scale Through Localisation

The most successful fintechs entering North America are those that treat localisation as a growth lever, not a constraint. They invest early in understanding regional differences, build adaptable products, and engage deeply with local ecosystems.

For Scottish fintechs, there is a strong foundation to build on: a reputation for innovation, strong regulatory understanding, and a global outlook. By pairing these strengths with a deliberate localisation strategy, North America becomes not just accessible – but highly scalable.

About Atlantic Fintech

Atlantic Fintech drives fintech innovation and growth across Atlantic Canada’s four provinces: New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island, and Newfoundland and Labrador. The organization builds a global fintech community by providing startups and scaling fintech companies with strategic connections, industry expertise, and market entry resources. Atlantic Fintech focuses on fostering collaboration and positioning Atlantic Canada as a recognized fintech hub of international relevance.

Atlantic Fintech offers tailored growth programs, specialized mentorship and go-to-market support. Having developed a strong ecosystem that integrates local talent with global fintech markets, leaders praise the community’s growth opportunities, strategic introductions, and educational events that empower companies to compete worldwide and build sustainable fintech ventures.

NatWest becomes first UK bank to launch home-buying guidance in ChatGPT

Users can now explore buying or re-mortgaging options within one of the world’s most used AI platforms.

On 30 April, NatWest Group has announced that it has become the first UK bank to offer an app in ChatGPT, providing NatWest-specific home-buying and re-mortgage guidance. This marks a new way for consumers to access trusted information and begin their home-buying journey and is an important step as NatWest continues to invest in technology and AI to meet customers’ evolving needs.

NatWest now appears in the ChatGPT app store alongside well-known platforms such as Rightmove and MoneySuperMarket. This means customers and non-customers can add and tag the bank in a query to receive NatWest‑specific mortgage and home‑buying guidance without having to leave the platform. Users will then be signposted to NatWest-owned channels to take the next steps, including to access specialist advice, appointments for colleague support or digital mortgage applications.

Consumers can explore their mortgage options and support decision-making in a more personalised way, with ChatGPT drawing on publicly available NatWest APIs to calculate how much they could borrow, test affordability and deposit scenarios, and receive tailored mortgage rates. By sharing details such as their income and monthly outgoings, users can receive responses grounded in real numbers, returning to the conversation later as their circumstances or questions evolve.

Conversations within the app are clearly branded as NatWest, so customers understand when they are receiving responses from the bank.

Solange Chamberlain, Retail CEO, NatWest Group said: “As technology and AI open up new ways for people to access information and think about their finances, NatWest is focused on meeting customer needs by showing up in the right places at the right time.

Buying a home is a major financial decision, and we want to support those early mortgage planning conversations wherever they may take place. By bringing trusted NatWest mortgage guidance directly into ChatGPT, we’re giving consumers more choice in how they explore their options in a more personalised and accessible way.”

NatWest continues to transform the digital mortgage experience and currently leads the market with the largest flow of digital new business. This builds on its recent partnership and integration with Rightmove, that sees Natwest provide home buyers with an instant fully digital NatWest mortgage decision in principle when applying through Rightmove, enabling customers to then complete their full application online.

Modulr and Sardine partner to bring real-time, AI-enabled fraud detection to automated payments

Sardine, the leading agentic risk platform to fight financial crime, today announced a partnership with Modulr, the payments automation platform built to scale. Through the partnership, Sardine will support Modulr with a suite of integrated fraud and anti-money laundering (AML) solutions.

The integration, as part of Modulr’s broader investment in financial crime and risk management capabilities, enables Modulr to leverage Sardine’s platform to detect and stop financial crime across card and real-time payment rails, while strengthening AML compliance and operational controls as the business scales. It is integrated into Modulr’s Risk & Compliance Hub – a connected set of tools and infrastructure that spans the entire customer lifecycle and is built to protect customers, reduce friction, and prevent financial crime.

Businesses are increasingly expected to move money instantly, yet many fraud and AML systems were built for slower settlement cycles and manual investigation workflows. By integrating Sardine’s risk platform directly into its payment infrastructure, Modulr is able to leverage the latest technology to prevent and manage financial crime.

“Real-time payments fundamentally change how fraud and AML needs to be managed,” said Soups Ranjan, CEO and Co-Founder of Sardine. “When funds move instantly, risk decisions need to happen just as quickly. Modulr’s platform delivers critical capability for automated payments, and we’re excited to help ensure those payment flows remain secure as they scale.”

“For Modulr to provide our customers with the ability to run mission-critical finance operations accurately and at scale, we need strong compliance that gives peace of mind without adding friction – which is why we are partnering with tools like Sardine, and building a Risk & Compliance Hub that monitors every step of the customer journey to prevent financial crime,” said Ben Taylor, Chief Operating Officer at Modulr. “For our customers, that translates to streamlined and low-friction onboarding, a better money movement experience, and crime prevention infrastructure that keeps pace as their business grows.”

Modulr’s payments automation platform streamlines money movement with greater accuracy, control and reliability – built to scale and powering use cases across payroll, supplier payments, lending, and travel. Sardine backs that network with a track record of protecting over $1T in transaction volume across a global customer base of enterprises and financial institutions. Sardine also operates the fastest growing fraud data consortium, spanning more than 5.5 billion devices, 670 million consumers, and 2.8 million businesses. By protecting funds across some of the highest risk industries in financial services, Sardine gains early visibility into emerging fraud patterns. That intelligence helps Modulr’s customers stay ahead of evolving threats.

Winning in APAC: Five Common Mistakes WealthTech Firms Make – and What Actually Works

By Patrick Donaldson, Founder, Mkt Dev APAC with Steven Carroll, Founder, CCAS

After a recent visit to Glasgow and Edinburgh, and a good conversation with Aleks Tomczyk, Chief Executive at FinTech Scotland, it struck me how many fintechs based in Scotland are starting to look seriously at Asia-Pacific (APAC) regional expansion – often with limited on-the-ground experience.  The mistakes I describe below come from what I have watched play out with firms entering APAC from major wealth and financial centres in Europe and North America over the past decade. The patterns are consistent, and the underlying discipline travels.

I have spent close to three decades on both sides of financial technology – eighteen years as a wealth management practitioner at firms like Barclays Wealth (originally at Greig Middleton stockbrokers in Edinburgh), then eleven years on the vendor side at Thomson Reuters, Refinitiv and LSEG, building commercial businesses across APAC. I now run Mkt Dev APAC from Singapore, helping firms from outside the region design and execute the right entry strategy for APAC markets.

My lens is WealthTech, and that is where my direct experience sits. Many of the patterns travel across other fintech verticals – payments, regtech, lending, data – but I will speak to what I know.  This is written for founders and commercial leaders of Scottish WealthTech firms who are starting to take APAC seriously.

Here are the five most common mistakes I see, and the playbook that actually works.

The opportunity is real – but it isn’t free

APAC is the fastest-growing wealth management region in the world. Private capital is flowing into Singapore and Hong Kong at scale, family offices are multiplying, and the region’s private banks and wealth platforms are investing heavily in technology to serve an increasingly sophisticated client base. The numbers vary by report, but the direction of travel is unambiguous.

That opportunity has also drawn a lot of entrants. Many of them will fail. Not because the market rejects them – because they arrived with the wrong plan.

From Edinburgh or London, it is tempting to see “APAC” as one more region on the sales dashboard. On the ground, it behaves like multiple distinct markets that reward discipline and punish generic expansion.

Common mistake #1: Treating APAC as a single market

APAC isn’t a country and it doesn’t behave as a single go-to-market region. Singapore, Hong Kong, Japan, Australia, Thailand and Malaysia all have different regulators, different buyer cultures and different languages. A playbook that works in Singapore won’t land in Tokyo. A distribution partner who opens doors in Hong Kong may have no relevant network in Kuala Lumpur.

The firms that win pick a beachhead – usually Singapore, for reasons I’ll come to – prove the model, then expand. The firms that fail hire a “VP APAC” and set them loose on a map.

Common mistake #2: Selling instead of listening

Too many WealthTech firms arrive in APAC with a deck and a demo. They assume the product that’s selling well in London or New York will translate, and that the job is to pitch it harder.

It won’t, and it isn’t.

The most effective first move for any senior leader entering APAC is to come and listen. Meet the buyers – the heads of technology at the private banks, the CIOs at the External Asset Managers (EAMs), the principals of the family offices, the heads of digital at the regional challengers – and ask them what their actual problems are before you tell them what you sell. Most of what’s needed to win comes out of those conversations. It isn’t expensive; it just requires discipline.

Common mistake #3: Hiring a Head of APAC too early – or managing it remotely from London or New York

These are two sides of the same mistake, and I see both regularly.

Hiring a “Head of APAC” as your first move commits you to £280-320k all-in before you know whether the market wants your product. It’s the wrong sequence. Start with an advisory relationship – someone who knows the buyers, understands the regulation, and can get you ten qualified meetings in ninety days. Validate product-market fit first, then hire to scale what’s working.The other side of the same coin: trying to run APAC from London or New York. You can’t. The time zones don’t work, the cultural distance is real, and the buyers here know when they’re dealing with a part-time effort. If APAC matters, it needs real local presence. If it doesn’t matter enough to fund that, don’t start.

Common mistake #4: Misreading the APAC buying culture

Two features of the APAC buying culture differ meaningfully from the UK and European pattern, and firms that miss them stall.

First, conflict-of-interest sensitivity runs higher than most vendors expect. Post the 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) scandal and under active MAS (Monetary Authority of Singapore) scrutiny, APAC private banks and family offices are genuinely wary of arrangements that blur commercial incentives. Transparent, independent fee structures – advisory retainers, project-based pricing, introduction fees – land better than opaque commission-linked models.

If your model depends on back-door commissions or informal revenue-sharing, you should assume it will be challenged early in the process.

Second, APAC buyers expect shorter time-to-value. Internal implementation teams at private banks and EAMs tend to be leaner than at their UK equivalents, so plug-and-play integration via APIs matters more than beautifully designed roadmaps. A product that can prove value in a ninety-day pilot gets traction where one that requires a twelve-month implementation programme does not.

For Scottish WealthTech firms, this often means simplifying the initial offer: focus on a sharply defined use case you can implement quickly, then expand once you have proved value.

Common mistake #5: Generic pitching

This sounds obvious but almost nobody does it well. Understand which firms are struggling with which problems before you walk in. A generic “here’s our platform” presentation dies in APAC. A targeted “here’s how we solve the exact issue your Head of Wealth Technology raised at last month’s conference” gets you a second meeting.

The research isn’t hard. Industry events, public filings, LinkedIn activity from senior leaders, regional press coverage – it’s all there. Most firms just don’t do the work.

A word on regulation

Every WealthTech firm entering APAC needs to think carefully about its regulatory posture. The first question is whether you are a vendor selling to regulated firms, or whether your product itself will require licensing. The second is easy to miss: even unregulated vendors carry real regulatory obligations, because their customers are regulated and pass compliance requirements through to suppliers via outsourcing, third-party risk and data rules. MAS in particular has detailed expectations here.

Singapore’s MAS and Hong Kong’s SFC both run sophisticated, generally pro-innovation licensing frameworks covering capital markets services, payment services, digital advisors and fund management. Both regulators are accessible – MAS’s FinTech Innovation Lab and sandbox routes are genuine, and UK firms are welcomed – but neither is a tick-box exercise.

I am not a regulatory specialist, and this is not the place for a rule-by-rule guide. But two practical rules hold: understand which bucket you fall into before you build a market entry plan, and budget time and expertise to get it right.  Getting it wrong can add six to twelve months.

What actually works

The positive version of all of the above is a short, practical playbook:

  • Send your CRO to listen first. Before you hire anyone, before you build a deck, before you commit to a strategy, have your senior commercial leader spend a week in Singapore and Hong Kong meeting buyers. What you hear in those conversations is worth more than any consultant’s report.
  • Start in Singapore. For most B2B WealthTech, it’s the region’s regulated hub, has the highest concentration of private banks, EAMs, family offices and regional headquarters, and is genuinely welcoming to fintech innovation. Use Singapore as your beachhead, not your only market.
  • Budget realistically for the listen-and-validate phase. Between travel, local presence, regulatory work and relationship building, budget £100-250k for the first year of serious effort. This is the phase before a permanent senior hire – the hire itself follows once you have validated product-market fit and know what you are scaling.
  • Use the government support available. Both the Singapore and UK sides offer meaningful market-entry support for fintechs, including grants that can offset a material share of overseas expansion costs. For FinTech Scotland members in particular, it is worth a conversation with both the UK’s trade and investment bodies in Singapore and Singapore’s own enterprise development agencies before you commit capital. This kind of support is not a substitute for commercial discipline – but it can materially reduce the cost of the listen-and-validate phase.
  • Find an APAC market entry consultant. For most Scottish WealthTech firms, the right first step in-region is a specialist market entry consultant rather than a full-time “Head of APAC”. Someone who understands both APAC wealth managers and the vendor landscape can help you avoid obvious missteps, pressure-test your assumptions and quickly tell you whether your product-market fit is realistic.
  • Lead with the augmented-advisor story. The strongest WealthTech narrative in APAC right now is productivity – automating low-value tasks so advisors can focus on high-value relationship work. APAC wealth firms run tight margins; anything that demonstrably improves advisor productivity gets budget approval faster than almost anything else.

Final thought

Winning in APAC isn’t about planting a flag – it’s about building relationships, understanding local nuance, and having the patience and local knowledge to do it right. For WealthTech firms serious about the region, the opportunity is enormous. But so is the cost of getting it wrong.

For FinTech Scotland members, the difference between “we tried Asia once” and a durable APAC business is rarely product. It is sequencing, listening, and committing to a real local presence.

If you’re a FinTech Scotland member thinking about APAC and want to talk it through, the team at FinTech Scotland can make an introduction – or reach me directly. I’m always happy to share a first view.


Patrick Donaldson is the founder of Mkt Dev APAC (https://mktdevapac.com), a WealthTech advisory consultancy helping companies from outside the region enter APAC markets. Based in Singapore, Patrick has close to three decades of experience across wealth management and financial technology, including senior commercial leadership roles at Thomson Reuters, Refinitiv and LSEG.

Steven Carroll is the founder of CCAS (Carroll Consulting and Advisory Services – https://ccas.tech), a specialist consultancy supporting information services and financial services firms on product, sales and marketing strategy. Based in London, Steven and Patrick previously collaborated on Winning in APAC: A WealthTech Perspective, from which this guest blog is adapted.

Remittance Isn’t Broken. The Outcome Is

By Ayodeji Jegede – Co-Founder, MoneyHive

This article represents my independent perspective as a founder, separate from my employed role. It is published by FinTech Scotland, the recognised industry body for Scottish fintech.

For over a decade, remittance has been framed as a problem of efficiency. Faster payments. Lower fees. Better FX. And to a large extent, the industry has delivered. Global remittance flows exceeded $850 billion, with the UK consistently ranking among the top outbound corridors. Yet despite this scale and maturity, the user experience remains fundamentally incomplete. Because the real problem doesn’t sit in the movement of money. It sits in what happens after.

Remittance is rarely the end goal. It is a means to an outcome: rent needs to be paid, school fees need to be settled, electricity needs to be restored, healthcare needs to be delivered. But once money is sent, the system effectively stops. There is no standardised way to confirm that a bill was actually paid, verify that a service was delivered, or track the outcome beyond “delivered.” This creates a structural disconnect between financial infrastructure and real-world execution. The transaction succeeds. The outcome remains uncertain. That gap is where trust erodes.

Why the Current Model Plateaus

The dominant competitive levers in remittance are now commoditised. Speed is near instant. Fees are compressing. FX margins are increasingly transparent. This creates a ceiling. Incremental improvements in these areas no longer translate into meaningful differentiation. More importantly, they do not solve the user’s core anxiety: “Did what I sent actually get done?” This is not a payments problem. It is a completion problem.

The next phase of fintech in this space will not be defined by better rails. It will be defined by what sits on top of them. Three layers are emerging: outcome assurance (systems that confirm completion of the intended action), embedded verification (direct integrations with service providers like utilities, schools and healthcare), and trust as infrastructure (status and proof becoming core product features). This reframes the core question from “Was the payment successful?” to “Was the responsibility fulfilled?”

What We’re Building at MoneyHive

At MoneyHive, we are building around this shift. Not how to move money, but how to ensure money delivers outcomes. This changes product design at a fundamental level: payments become infrastructure not the product, status tracking becomes real‑time and structured, proof of completion becomes a default expectation, and recurring obligations become programmable. The result is not just a financial service. It is a coordination layer between diaspora users and real‑world services back home.

Outside of my employment, MoneyHive has achieved independent validation. We were accepted into Microsoft for Startups, earning $!00,000 in credits (April 2026), a competitive global program. Our application to the FCA Regulatory Sandbox is under assessment with a case officer assigned. We have built an organic waitlist of more than a quarter of 1000 diaspora users from the UK‑Nigeria corridor. MoneyHive is an active member of the FinTech Scotland community and has been accepted into the Techscaler Catalyst programme, a Scottish Government backed accelerator.

Starting in the UK to Nigeria corridor, a few patterns are becoming clear. Users are less sensitive to marginal FX gains than assumed. Visibility consistently outperforms price as a trust driver. Repeat usage is driven by certainty, not convenience. In other words, the strongest retention loop is not “This was cheap and fast.” It is “This worked exactly as expected, and I can rely on it again.” That distinction matters because it defines where long‑term value sits.

Why This Matters for the UK and Scotland

The UK is one of the most important remittance hubs globally, both in volume and diversity of corridors. At the same time, ecosystems like Scotland are increasingly positioning themselves at the intersection of fintech innovation, data infrastructure and cross‑sector collaboration. This creates a unique opportunity because solving for outcomes in remittance is not purely a payments challenge. It requires coordination across financial services, utilities and service providers, identity and verification systems, and regulatory frameworks. This is where ecosystems, not just startups, become critical. The companies that succeed will not operate in isolation. They will plug into networks.

The remittance market is large. But more importantly, it is mis defined. It has been optimised around movement, when it should be optimised around completion. That leaves a significant layer of value unaddressed. The opportunity is not to build another way to send money. It is to build systems that ensure something meaningful happens because of it.

Closing Thought

Remittance has always been framed as a financial transaction. In reality, it is a coordination problem between people, money and outcomes. The industry solved the movement of money. It has not yet solved the delivery of intent. The next generation of fintech companies will. And when they do, the question will no longer be “How fast did the money arrive?” It will be “Did it do what it was supposed to do?” That is where trust is built. And where the next wave of value will come from.

Building societies face growing “Digital Delivery Gap” as member expectations outpace communication infrastructure

New research from Legado highlights structural challenges in communication infrastructure despite rising digital expectations from members

Building societies are facing a growing “Digital Delivery Gap” as member expectations for simple, digital communication continue to rise, while underlying systems and processes struggle to keep pace.

New research from UK fintech Legado highlights a structural challenge across the mutual sector. The Building Society Insight Report 2026 finds that 91% of building societies say their communication systems are not fully integrated with core member platforms, while 73% rely on three or more systems to manage communications.

At the same time, 82% of organisations continue to send more than a quarter of communications by post, and only 18% say members can complete most key actions fully online.

This gap is emerging as member behaviour shifts. 72% of members already use digital platforms to manage their accounts, and 80% would be willing to sign documents digitally if available.

Founder and CEO Josif Grace said:

“Building societies have made strong progress in digital banking, but communication has not evolved at the same pace.

The challenge is no longer digital adoption. It is how communication is delivered. The opportunity now is to simplify that experience and make it consistent for members.”

The research also highlights the impact on member experience. 22% of members say they have been unsure whether their building society received or processed a document they sent, reflecting a lack of visibility across communication journeys.

Legado will be sharing findings from the report at the Building Societies Association Annual Conference, taking place at the EICC in Edinburgh on 28–29 April, where the team will be available at stand 22.

The Building Society Insight Report 2026 is intended to support a wider industry conversation around how the mutual sector can modernise communication while maintaining the trust and accessibility that define the model.

The full report is available here.

Legado, headquartered in Edinburgh, supports financial institutions in delivering secure digital communications, document management and signing workflows. Its clients include FNZ, Quilter, Scottish Building Society, Moneyhub and Co-op Legal Services.

MoneyHive

University of Glasgow and Lloyds Banking Group announce groundbreaking agentic AI research programme

  • The University of Glasgow and Lloyds Banking Group have launched a four‑year research partnership to explore how AI can support software and data engineering.
  • The project will help Lloyds Banking Group implement agentic AI at scale within their software engineering practice, while giving University researchers a unique opportunity to study large‑scale engineering transformation in a real‑world setting.
  • The partnership will create a PhD, a Masters of Research and a post‑doctoral role.
  • The project’s findings will guide how Lloyds Group scales the use of agentic AI across wider data and engineering teams and contribute to the development of best practice, national policy and industry standards.

A new research partnership between the University of Glasgow and Lloyds Banking Group is setting out to explore the potential of AI to support software and data engineering. 

Over the next four years, the partners will explore how large language model-based coding tools called agentic AIs could support and enhance the work of software and data engineers at Lloyds Banking Group. 

Agentic AIs are software tools which act as semi-autonomous ‘agents’ to complete tasks of varying complexity. In software and data engineering, they are already being used to write and debug code, solve technical problems, and perform a variety of project management tasks.

As the UK’s largest digital bank, Lloyds Banking Group is investing significantly in developing new digital software and services, alongside training and new skills for colleagues, to support its 28 million customers.

The University’s research team and Lloyds Banking Group will work together to design experiments that test the efficacy of agentic AI for high priority activities in individual software teams.  The team will use a variety of empirical software engineering research techniques to gather evidence, such as data mining.

The project will help Lloyds Banking Group implement an agentic AI approach to software and data engineering and measure the impact across their organisation. At the same time, it will provide software engineering researchers at the University with a rare opportunity to study and contribute to a large-scale transformation to software and data engineering practice.

The collaboration will create a PhD and a Masters of Research position at the University, along with a post-doctoral research associate post to work with Lloyds’ software engineering teams.

Dr Tim Storer, of the University of Glasgow’s School of Computing Science, will lead the University’s side of the partnership along with colleague Dr Peggy Gregory. 

Dr Storer said: “Agentic-driven software engineering is a fast-developing sector with the potential to enable human engineers to work more efficiently by automating some tasks and allowing them to focus their skills on higher-level work.

“However, there has been relatively little research in industry on how integrating agentic AI into software engineering practices can be done effectively in large-scale organisations. 

“We’re delighted to be partnering with Lloyds Banking Group on this groundbreaking project. Together, we will enable the Group’s plans to increase their software development capacity, produce high-quality research for the benefit of all, and influence national policy and industry standards.”


Lloyds Banking Group’s contribution will be led by Dr Shane Montague, Head of Research Engineering, with executive sponsorship from Professor Andrew McDonald, Enterprise Data Provisioning, Technology Platform Lead.

Dr Shane Montague said: “Lloyds Banking Group’s mission to Help Britain Prosper means leading innovation that genuinely improves how engineering gets done, with a focus on delivering enhanced digital services for our customers.

We’re excited to partner with the University of Glasgow to gather rigorous, real-world evidence from day-to-day engineering work, so we can understand what really works and how agentic AI can be applied effectively and responsibly at scale.” 

Each quarter, the partnership will task Lloyds Banking Group’s software and data engineers in Bristol, Manchester and Hyderabad to work with their agentic AI counterparts on a different type of task with the aim to measure the impact on quality and speed of delivery. 

As the partnership continues, the Group will develop and improve their understanding of how to harness the benefits of agentic AI. Successful projects will be rolled out across the Group’s wider data teams, and eventually to all software and data engineering teams.

At the same time, Glasgow researchers will work alongside the teams to gather evidence on each project’s impact on efficiency, workflow and the day-to-day work of the teams.

Together, the partners will publish regular research papers documenting their work and develop best-practice documents to help organisations of all scales integrate AI into their software and data product development processes.